Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Povery as a Disability

When I came home I began thinking whether or not I believed poverty to be a disability. I looked at this website: http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:oQMtoBKhUJsJ:hcdg.org/definition.htm+poverty,+a+handicap+in+education&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=12&gl=us which included the World Health Organization's definition of a disability to be: “any restriction or lack (resulting from any impairment) of ability to perform an activity in the manner or within the range considered normal for a human being”. Naturally, we think of an impairment as a handicap, a physical abnormality. However, after reading England's take on it I began to think differently. According to England, "to label poverty as a handicap is to bring it up against the American dream where it cannot peaceably exist" (England 36). We don't want to label poverty as a handicap because, like England says, there are too many fairytales where people have pulled themselves out of poverty. But, disabled people are considered to have a disability if they are intellecually or learning disabled, or if they have long term illnesses, mental or psychological injuries (as stated on the website). Someone without money, someone who is living in extreme poverty can not possibly be expected to be on the same page intellectually as students who are middle class. They simply do not have the resources in education. Additionally, their diets are probably not as nutritional as others, which impairs their brain activity. People who are poor also can't afford proper health care, long term illnesses are considered to be a disability. Why as a society do we place poor and disabled into two separate categories? Being poor clearly has negative effects which are put in the disability category so why don't we just combine the two factors? As England says, a child who is disabled on the outside has all of these accomodations in the classroom for them, but the child who is poor, can't eat right, doesn't have parents to help them with their work, and doesn't have proper health care because they can't afford it, that child is left behind. Just because they don't look disabled does not mean they aren't. Poor students should have an opportunity for extra help, extra attention and extra consideration. Disabilities should be labeled as set backs. The World Health Organization even says a disability is a restriction from an activity so why isn't poverty in that category?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I thought you had some interesting topics in your blog. It may just be wording but I want to take objection to one of the points you said in your post. "Someone without money, someone who is living in extreme poverty can not possibly be expected to be on the same page intellectually as students who are middle class. They simply do not have the resources in education. " - Your right they do not have the same tools to be sucessful, but by no means are they incapable of getting to the same intellectual plateau. More resources would definetly assist and are probally needed in more cases than not. But as optimistic and possibly corney as it sounds, I truley believe that all children can and will learn with the resources and help they need. We as a society need to get them that help. - but yea even without these resources many are still capable of sucess

Josh said...

I agree with the previous statement that all children are capable of learning even without having the money and necessary resources. Even though this may be lacking for a child, they still may have the will to make the best of their situation. We all know that resources are a major problem in schools, but we cant keep making that excuse for why children are not allowing themselves to make their situation better

Rachel Ainspan said...

As you mentioned I never thought of poverty as a disability, however I don't think it should be labeled as one. I think that it definitely disables students from learning at the same capacity as others but I think the connotation we give to a disability says that most likely they can't overcome it. This can do one of two things; keep people in poverty so they could be labeled as disabled and it could open the door for other "disabling" factors.

Ms. Educated said...

Compare her definition to the situations mentioned in Kozol's piece. Sad, isn't it?